A Husserlian Approach to Aesthetic Experience: Existential Disinterest and Axiological Interest
Abstract
As early as 1905, Husserl made clear that, when it comes to the aesthetic consideration, our “interest” is not directed toward the existence of the object as such, but rather toward the object’s way of appearance. Husserl’s famous letter to Hofmannsthal (1907) goes as far as to suggest that any existential concerns are potentially even a menace to the purity of aesthetic experience. This position clearly echoes Kant’s account of the aesthetic judgment presented in the third Critique, notably as regards the notion of disinterestedness. However, this is not tantamount to claiming that aesthetic attitude implies the suspension of all interest: this paper aims to show that it would be more appropriate to discuss it in terms of a change of interest: from an existential interest to an axiological one.
References
— (1977). «Diderot, Brecht, Eisenstein (1973)». In: R. Barthes, Image - Music - Text, London: Fontana Press, 69-78.
BROUGH, J. (2005). «Translator’s introduction». In: E. Husserl (Ed.), Phantasy, Image Consciousness and Memory (1898-1925), Dordrecht: Springer, xxix-lxviii.
COMETTI, J.-P. (2002). «Merleau-Ponty, Wittgenstein, and the Question of Expression». Revue internationale de philosophie, 1: 73-89.
CONSTÂNCIO, J.M.P. (2017). «Who is right, Kant or Stendhal?: On Nietzsche’s Kantian Critique of Kant’s Aesthetics». In: M.J.M. Branco and K. Hay (eds.), Nietzsche and Kant on Aesthetics and Anthropology. London: Bloomsbury, 63-98.
COSTA, V. (2014). Verso una fenomenologia delle tonalità emotive In: G. Matteucci and M. Portera (eds.), La natura delle emozioni, Milano: Mimesis, 129-143.
DESCARTES, R. (1996). La Dioptrique (1637). In: Id., Œuvres de Descartes, Paris: Cerf, 1897-1909, rééd. Paris: Vrin-CNRS, 11 vol., t. VI.
DESIDERI, F. (2004). Forme dell’estetica. Dall’esperienza del bello al problema dell’arte, Roma-Bari: Laterza.
GUYER, P. (1978). «Disinterestedness and Desire in Kant’s Aesthetics». The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 36/4: 449-460.
HIRSCH, R. (1968). «Edmund Husserl und Hugo von Hofmannsthal: eine Begegnung und ein Brief». In: C.-J. Friedrich and B. Reifenberg (eds.), Sprache und Politik. Festgabe für Dolf Sternberger zum sechzigsten Geburtstag, Heidelberg: Verlag Lambert Schneider, 108-115.
HUSSERL, E. (2019). First Philosophy. Lectures 1923/24 and Related Texts from the Manuscripts (1920-1925), Dordrecht: Springer.
— (2009). «Letter to Hofmannsthal (1907)». Site, 26-27: 2.
— (2005). Phantasy, Image Consciousness and Memory (1898-1925), Dordrecht: Springer.
— (2002). Zur phänomenologischen Reduktion. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1926-1935), Dordrecht: Kluwer.
— (1989). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, Second Book, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
LUFT, S. (2019). «Introduction to the translation». In: E. Husserl, First Philosophy. Lectures 1923/24 and Related Texts from the Manuscripts (1920-1925), Dordrecht: Springer, xiii- lxxxv.
PIPPIN, R. (2015). «Psychology Degree Zero? The Representation of Action in the Films of the Dardenne Brothers». Critical Inquiry, 41/4: 757-785.
RICHIR, M. (1999). «Commentaire de Phénoménologie de la conscience esthétique de Husserl». Revue d’Esthétique (Esthétique et phénoménologie), 36: 15-23.
RODRIGO, P. (2009). L’intentionnalité créatrice. Problèmes de phénoménologie et d’esthétique, Paris: Vrin.
SCARAMUZZA, G. and SCHUHMANN, K. (1990). «Ein Husserlmanuskript über Ästhetik». Husserl Studies, 7/3: 165-177.
SCHOLZ, O. R. (2004). Bild, Darstellung, Zeichen. Philosophische Theorien bildlicher Darstellung, Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
VOLTOLINI, A. (2013). Immagine, Bologna: Il Mulino.
WITTGENSTEIN, L. (1980). Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology, vol. I, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.