Cartography of the Phenomenon and the Phenomenon as Cartography

Guilherme Riscali

Guilherme Riscali Universidade de Lisboa

Abstract

This paper discusses Gilbert Ryle’s image of philosophy as cartography in an attempt to explore the idea of a cartography of the phenomenon, confronting it with the sense it takes in Edmund Husserl’s transcendental phenomenology. Ryle tries to grasp the particularity of philosophical tasks as being about specific sorts of problems, not about specific sorts of objects. What is required both of a cartographer and of a philosopher is, according to him, to look at familiar spaces in wholly unusual terms. Husserlian phenomenology then, with its rediscovery of consciousness as an absolute, unbounded field, meets quite well this demand. The uncovered field of the phenomena is not a new region, opposing that of the objects as faced in the natural attitude. It is rather a completely different attitude, just as a map is not a share of the world, but a distinct orientation towards it. The phenomenon, therefore, would not be something that is there to be cartographed as much as a kind of cartography itself. A phenomenological cartography, however, is one that has its specific marks, different from those of the Rylean conception.

References

DE WARREN, N. (2015). “Concepts without pedigree: The noema and neutrality modification”, in Andrea Staiti (ed.). Commentary on Husserl’s “Ideas I”. Berlin: De Gruyter, 225-255.
FINK, E. (1981). “Operative concepts in Husserl’s Phenomenology”, in Apriori and World. European Contributions to Husserl’s Phenomenology. The Hague: Martin Nijhoff, 56-70.
HUSSERL, E. (1999). The Idea of Phenomenology. Trans. L. Hardy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
— (1983). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Trans. F. Kersten. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
MORAN, D. and J. COHEN, J. (2012). The Husserl Dictionary. London: Continuum.
MOURA, C. A. R. (2006). “Prefácio”, in Ideias para uma Fenomenologia Pura e para uma Filosofia Fenomenológica. Trad. M. Suzuki. Aparecida: Ideias e Letras, 15-23.
— (1989). Crítica da Razão na Fenomenologia. São Paulo: Nova Stella/EDUSP.
O’CONNOR, J. K., “Category Mistakes and Logical Grammar: Ryle’s Husserlian Tutelage”, in Symposium, 16 (2), 235-250.
RYLE, G. (2009). Collected Papers. Vol. 2: 1929-1968. London: Routledge.
STAITI, A. (2015). “Introduction”, in Andrea Staiti (ed.). Commentary on Husserl’s “Ideas I”. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1-12.